Monday, October 19, 2009
Black Face in Fashion
So the ugly nuisance called black face has re-emerged in a new form called high fashion. Recently French Vogue has included a spread of a Caucasian model with blatantly darkened skin. Now some argue that the photos are doing something new and different but what is so new about demeaning peoples of African decent? You may ask what does this have to do with art? Well high fashion is considered a form of "wear able art" if you will and it also relates to my own personal art work that examines the use of black face and other images. So is their a difference between what is offensive in art for mere aesthetic reasons and what is blatantly offensive to garner intellectual thought?
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Wildboyz is Art
So why are the antics of Wildboyz, Steve O and Chris Pontius art? Well in art theory jargon the show could be defined as a study in phenomenology. In this case one’s relation to native animals and culture of a region and the subsequent distress the body may encounter as a result of this interaction. Basically Steve O and Chris placing themselves in situations that will most certainly cause bodily harm as inflicted by animals native to the locale. Or they may also partake in cultural activities for the purpose of gauging their body’s reaction.
So how is this show art? Well its art because this isnt the first time someone has inflicted pain upon themseles in order to reach out to an audience. Much like the work of famous performance artist Chris Burden who's work from the seventies entitled Shoot which consisted of the artist having himself shot with a rifle in the arm. Also the performance Trans-Fixed (1974) where Burden laid upon a Volkswagen beetle with his hands nailed to the hood of the car relates to the Wildboyz. Burden and the Wildboyz similarly experiment with danger and pain, both of which are self inflicted as a form of expression.
The scope of performance art is wide and varied so why can't the Wildboyz be included in this definition? Artists have pushed the limits of constructed definitions beyond the white box of the gallery space into a different realm. Artists such as damali ayo, Joseph Beuys, Nam June Paik, Survival Research Laboratories, Janine Antoni, and Guillermo Vargas have produced work that ranges from the romantic to controversial. Now it maybe argued that the show Wildboyz is not art because a profound social or political message is lacking, but the show is a form of personal art in that it exhibits one’s own body in harm’s way for the sake of seeing what happens and experiencing the pain. In other words the show is ''l'art pour l’art’’ or art for art’s sake.
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Disney Animation... a love hate relationship
More Issues/Grievances against movie
- Prince Naveen (love interest) is not black/African American, but racially ambigous
- A setting in New Orleans, Louisiana is being insensitive to Hurricane Katrina victims
- the villainizing of the Voodoo religion
- the dialect, or speech pattern of certain charcters is unbecoming
- the princess, new name Tiana, is in the form of a frog for a majority of the movies
I am sure there are more issues that are not listed here. What I am most surprised about is the public reception of the movie so far. Yes, this may be the first Black/African American princess but it is not the first time Disney has created characters, scenarios, or movies that are offensive. This is defiently not the first time Disney has included racial stereotypes and ethnic prejudices in their films.
After so many Disney movies audiences should not be surprised that a princess does not have a mother, that she talks to animals (which is usually her sidekick), she is heavily dependent upon a man to rescue her, and the villain has significantly darker and/or ethnic features. Prime examples are The Little Mermaid Ariel does not have a mother, she talks to crabs and fish, and the villian Ursula is a strange purplish blue color. Another example is Aladdin, Jasmine does not have a mother, talks to tigers, and the villian Javar has darker skin and ethnic features in comparison to the rest of the characters. The film Mulan may break from the norm in that she is not dependent upon a man to rescue her, she enlists in the army in her father's place, but like all the others she talks to animals and the Huns (villians)are blue. All of these things are not new but just a formula set down by Walt himself.
The current princess monopoly has diversified yet there are still issues that probably wont go away but The Princess and the Frog is a step in the right direction flaws and all. I personally look forward to the debut of the American princess Tiana which we have not seen the likes of since Pocahontas. Think about it, these two princesses are the only ones that are blatantly American.
for a look at the 9 most racist moments in Disney movie history check this out,
http://www.cracked.com/article_15677_9-most-racist-disney-characters.html
if your curious take a look at the newest edition to the princess monopoly, note that Princess Kida of Atlantis is not included
http://disney.go.com/princess/#/home/